Heather, Violet, Rose, etc. All are objects. Also, popular names. My name is Brandy Dawn. A beverage and a time of day. Is the argument only for names that were…objects? First? Or just names not commonly used as names? Im kind of teasing a bit;)
It is about respect for your child’s future. Rose, Heather and Violet are names that you can see an adult having. Blade is a futuristic vampire hunter and Tiara is a stripper. Just my opinion.
mybrainexplode likes this
mvonbank likes this
queerasiwannabe1102 likes this
oursarah likes this
nomadiclife2006 likes this
sunsaturatedsidethoughts likes this
sobeginsourodyssey reblogged this from swayinganyway and added:
i don’t think that names have any bearing whatsoever on how a child turns out. that said, i went to school with a kid...
yosafbridge likes this
beerliesandaudiotape likes this
livelaughlovetransform likes this
vikax reblogged this from swayinganyway
steelopus likes this
girlredacted likes this
felistella likes this
nikkidactyl likes this
loveismayhem likes this
swayinganyway reblogged this from reviewsasaparent and added:
I’m wondering what other opinions are on this? Do you think a name chosen by parents define who a child will grow to...
swayinganyway likes this
somamasays said:
Respect for your child’s future also means that you don’t assume that a name will define their future. Your values, love and parenting will guide them. Their name won’t.
midwestern-momma likes this
motherofanangel likes this
mybellarina said:
Sometimes I regret giving arabella her name because it’s hard to imagine a business person or something like that with her name. But it fits her and if she wants to go by her middle name (violet lol) or something else I’ll get over it eventually.
mybellarina likes this
reviewsasaparent posted this
